DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.1 vs. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
DeepSeek V3.1 was released 1 month before DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 163.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 32.8K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | August 21, 2025 11 months ago August 21st, 2025 | September 22, 2025 10 months ago September 22nd, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.1 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | DeepSeek |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
DeepSeek V3.1 is roughly 0.9x less expensive compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for input tokens and roughly 1.0x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.25 per million tokens | $0.27 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.95 per million tokens | $0.95 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.13 per million tokens | $0.13 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.1 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 43.5 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,143 Elo (#78 in Website (48.0% win rate)) | 1,216 Elo (#42 in UI Component (59.5% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.1 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare DeepSeek V3.1 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks