Magica logo

o3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: o3 vs. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

o3 was released 4 months before Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
o3o3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
OpenAI logoOpenAI
Qwen logoQwen
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
200K
tokens
81.9K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
100K
tokens
32.8K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 16th, 2025
August 28th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
June 30, 2024
June 30, 2025

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
o3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input Types
Supported input formats
🖼️Image📝Text📁File
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Always enabled
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GPTQwen3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
ProprietaryAvailable on HuggingFace →

Pricing

o3 is roughly 10.0x more expensive compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for input tokens and roughly 3.3x more expensive for output tokens.
o3o3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00
per million tokens
$0.20
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$8.00
per million tokens
$2.40
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
$0.01
per search
Not specified
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.50
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between o3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
o3o3
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
Benchmark not available.
14.6
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
Benchmark not available.
12.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
Benchmark not available.
1.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,200 Elo
(#47 in Data Viz (48.1% win rate))
953 Elo
(#104 in Data Viz (33.3% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes o3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 unique.
OpenAI logoo3 by OpenAI understands both text and images, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 200K token context window. Reasonably priced at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output tokens. Includes built-in content moderation for safer outputs. Released April 16th, 2025.
Qwen logoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 81.9K token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.20/M input and $2.40/M output tokens. Released August 28th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare o3 with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🌐Translation

Multilingual translation tasks