Magica logo

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released 1 year before DeepSeek V4 Flash.
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Meta logoMeta
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1M
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
Not specified
tokens
128K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 24th, 2026
December 6th, 2024
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
December 31, 2023

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
OptionalEffort: Extra High, HighDefault: High
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekLlama3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

DeepSeek V4 Flash is roughly 0.7x less expensive compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 0.5x less expensive for output tokens.
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.09
per million tokens
$0.13
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.19
per million tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.02
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
40.3
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
9.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
56.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
11.9
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
31.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
0.3
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,254 Elo
(#32 in Game Dev (50.4% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct unique.
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.09/M input and $0.19/M output tokens. Released April 24th, 2026.
Meta logoLlama 3.3 70B Instruct by Meta can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 131.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Released December 6th, 2024.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories