Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs. MiMo-V2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B was released 19 days before MiMo-V2.5.
Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 26B A4B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Google logoGoogle
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
262.1K
tokens
1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
256K
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 3rd, 2026
April 22nd, 2026

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiMo-V2.5
Input Types
Supported input formats
🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GemmaOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

Gemma 4 26B A4B is roughly 0.7x less expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 1.1x more expensive for output tokens.
Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 26B A4B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.30
per million tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
Not specified
$0.0028
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.5.
Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 26B A4B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
25.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
39.3
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
11
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
Benchmark not available.
1,299 Elo
(#15 in UI Component (55.5% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
Google logoGemma 4 26B A4B by Google understands both text and images, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output tokens. Released April 3rd, 2026.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories