This blog post explores a document purported to be L. Ron Hubbard's last message to Scientologists, analyzing its authenticity, context, and implications within the Scientology community, particularly regarding the Independent Scientology movement and its leaders.
In a recent discussion, a document surfaced that claims to be L. Ron Hubbard's last official message to Scientologists. This document was found among the possessions of Cheryl Frell, whose father had a long history with Scientology, including a stint in Independent Scientology, also known as the Free Zone. This blog post delves into the origins of the document, its content, and the broader implications for the Scientology community.
Cheryl's father was involved with Scientology from the early 1960s, later leaving to join Independent Scientology. This background is crucial as it explains why he possessed the document in question. Independent Scientologists, often referred to derogatorily as "squirrels" by mainstream Scientologists, practice Scientology outside the official Church. The document is believed to have been distributed in 1986, shortly after Hubbard's death.
The document is formatted like an official executive directive from Hubbard, dated September 13, 1984, and supposedly intended for release in August 1986. The content of the message raises several eyebrows, particularly its tone and the admissions made within it. Here are some key points from the message:
Upon reviewing the document, the speaker expresses skepticism about its authenticity, suggesting it may have been fabricated by David Mayo, a former senior technical supervisor in Scientology who left to form his own group. The language and sentiments expressed in the document do not align with Hubbard's established communication style. For instance, Hubbard's typical rhetoric would not include apologies or admissions of wrongdoing, especially regarding financial matters.
Several contradictions within the document further fuel doubts about its legitimacy:
The existence of this document and its content have significant implications for both the Church of Scientology and Independent Scientologists. If the document is indeed a forgery, it reflects ongoing tensions within the Scientology community, particularly between those who remain loyal to the Church and those who have distanced themselves.
Independent Scientologists often view themselves as the true custodians of Hubbard's teachings, and this document, if accepted as genuine, could bolster their claims. However, the skepticism surrounding its authenticity may also serve to reinforce the divide between the two factions.
The alleged last message from L. Ron Hubbard raises more questions than answers. While it purports to offer insights into Hubbard's final thoughts and intentions, the inconsistencies and contradictions within the document suggest it may not be a genuine communication from the founder of Scientology. As the debate continues, it highlights the complexities and divisions within the Scientology community, particularly regarding the legacy of its founder and the future of the movement.
Readers are encouraged to share their thoughts and any additional context regarding this document and its implications for both the Church of Scientology and Independent Scientology.
