Magica logo

Codestral 2508 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Codestral 2508 vs. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Codestral 2508 was released 9 months before Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Codestral 2508Codestral 2508
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Mistral logoMistral
Google logoGoogle
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
256K
tokens
1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
Not specified
tokens
65.5K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
August 1st, 2025
May 7th, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
March 31, 2025
Not reported

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Codestral 2508
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text📁File
📝Text🖼️Image🎬Video📁File🎵Audio
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Not reported
Enabled by defaultEffort: High, Medium, Low, MinimalDefault: Minimal
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
MistralGemini
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation

Pricing

Codestral 2508 is roughly 1.2x more expensive compared to Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for input tokens and roughly 0.6x less expensive for output tokens.
Codestral 2508Codestral 2508
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.30
per million tokens
$0.25
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.90
per million tokens
$1.50
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
Not specified
$0.014
per search
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.03
per million tokens
$0.02
per million tokens
Cache Write Cost
Cost to write input tokens to the cache
Not specified
$0.08
per million tokens
Reasoning Token Cost
Cost for internal reasoning tokens
Not specified
$1.50
per million tokens
Image Input Cost
Additional cost for each image input
Not specified
$0.00000025
per image
Audio Input Cost
Additional cost for audio input
Not specified
$0.0000005
per unit
Audio Cache Cost
Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens
Not specified
$0.05
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Codestral 2508Codestral 2508
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,078 Elo
(#84 in 3D (45.5% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Codestral 2508 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite unique.
Mistral logoCodestral 2508 by Mistral can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 256K token context window. Very affordable at $0.30/M input and $0.90/M output tokens. Released August 1st, 2025.
Google logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite by Google understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.25/M input and $1.50/M output tokens. Released May 7th, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories