Command A vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Command A vs. Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Command A was released 3 months before Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 256K tokens | 256K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 8.2K tokens | Not specified tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | March 13, 2025 1 year ago March 13th, 2025 | June 20, 2025 1 year ago June 20th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | August 31, 2024 | October 31, 2023 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Command A | Mistral Small 3.2 24B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 🖼️Image📝Text |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Mistral |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning Mode✓Content Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Command A is roughly 25.0x more expensive compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B for input tokens and roughly 33.3x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $2.50 per million tokens | $0.10 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $10.00 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.01 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Command A and Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 22.5 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 27.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 9.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 957 Elo (#101 in Data Viz (43.3% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Command A and Mistral Small 3.2 24B unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Command A with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Mistral Small 3.2 24B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks