Magica logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released 4 months before Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Google logoGoogle
Qwen logoQwen
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1M
tokens
128K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
65.5K
tokens
128K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
June 17th, 2025
February 1st, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
January 31, 2025
June 30, 2024

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input Types
Supported input formats
📁File🖼️Image📝Text🎵Audio🎬Video
📝Text🖼️Image
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GeminiQwen
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
ProprietaryAvailable on HuggingFace →

Pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash is roughly 0.4x less expensive compared to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 2.5x more expensive for output tokens.
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.30
per million tokens
$0.80
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$2.50
per million tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
$0.014
per search
Not specified
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.03
per million tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
Cache Write Cost
Cost to write input tokens to the cache
$0.08
per million tokens
Not specified
Reasoning Token Cost
Cost for internal reasoning tokens
$2.50
per million tokens
Not specified
Image Input Cost
Additional cost for each image input
$0.0000003
per image
Not specified
Audio Input Cost
Additional cost for audio input
$0.000001
per unit
Not specified
Audio Cache Cost
Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.
Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,159 Elo
(#67 in Data Viz (48.4% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct unique.
Google logoGemini 2.5 Flash by Google understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output tokens. Released June 17th, 2025.
Qwen logoQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct by Qwen understands both text and images, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 128K token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.80/M input and $1.00/M output tokens. Released February 1st, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories