Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite was released 2 months before GPT-5.6 Sol.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 1.1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 65.5K tokens | 128K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | May 7, 2026 2 months ago May 7th, 2026 | July 9, 2026 17 days ago July 9th, 2026 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | February 16, 2026 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🖼️Image🎬Video📁File🎵Audio | 📁File🖼️Image📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Enabled by defaultEffort: High, Medium, Low, MinimalDefault: Minimal | Enabled by defaultEffort: Max, Extra High, High, Medium, Low, NoneDefault: Medium |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemini | GPT |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning Mode✓Content Moderation |
Pricing
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is roughly 0.05x less expensive compared to GPT-5.6 Sol for input tokens and roughly 0.05x less expensive for output tokens.
Short Context Pricing Base rates before a long-context threshold applies | ||
|---|---|---|
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.25 per million tokens | $5.00 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $1.50 per million tokens | $30.00 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | $0.014 per search | $0.01 per search |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.02 per million tokens | $0.50 per million tokens |
Cache Write Cost Cost to write input tokens to the cache | $0.08 per million tokens | $6.25 per million tokens |
Reasoning Token Cost Cost for internal reasoning tokens | $1.50 per million tokens | Not specified |
Image Input Cost Additional cost for each image input | $0.00000025 per image | Not specified |
Audio Input Cost Additional cost for audio input | $0.0000005 per unit | Not specified |
Audio Cache Cost Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | Not specified |
Long Context Pricing Rates for prompts with 272,000 or more tokens | ||
Input Token Cost Long-context input cost per million tokens | Not specified | $10.00 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Long-context output cost per million tokens | Not specified | $45.00 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Long-context cache read cost per million tokens | Not specified | $1.00 per million tokens |
Cache Write Cost Long-context cache write cost per million tokens | Not specified | $12.50 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.6 Sol.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 58.9 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 77.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 54 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.6 Sol unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare GPT-5.6 Sol with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks