Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M2.5 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs. MiniMax M2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
MiniMax M2.5 was released 2 months before Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |  MiniMax M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | Google | MiniMax |
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 204.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 65.5K tokens | 196.6K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | May 7, 2026 2 months ago May 7th, 2026 | February 12, 2026 5 months ago February 12th, 2026 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiniMax M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🖼️Image🎬Video📁File🎵Audio | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Enabled by defaultEffort: High, Medium, Low, MinimalDefault: Minimal | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemini | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Proprietary | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is roughly 1.7x more expensive compared to MiniMax M2.5 for input tokens and roughly 1.7x more expensive for output tokens.
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiniMax M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.25 per million tokens | $0.15 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $1.50 per million tokens | $0.90 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | $0.014 per search | Not specified |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.02 per million tokens | $0.05 per million tokens |
Cache Write Cost Cost to write input tokens to the cache | $0.08 per million tokens | Not specified |
Reasoning Token Cost Cost for internal reasoning tokens | $1.50 per million tokens | Not specified |
Image Input Cost Additional cost for each image input | $0.00000025 per image | Not specified |
Audio Input Cost Additional cost for audio input | $0.0000005 per unit | Not specified |
Audio Cache Cost Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2.5.
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | MiniMax M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,247 Elo (#35 in Website (57.5% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2.5 unique.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite by Google understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.25/M input and $1.50/M output tokens. Released May 7th, 2026.MiniMax M2.5 by MiniMax can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 204.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.15/M input and $0.90/M output tokens. Released February 12th, 2026.Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks