GLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.1-Codex (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GLM 5.2 vs. GPT-5.1-Codex
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
GPT-5.1-Codex was released 7 months before GLM 5.2.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 400K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | June 16, 2026 1 month ago June 16th, 2026 | November 13, 2025 8 months ago November 13th, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 5.2 | GPT-5.1-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🖼️Image |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Enabled by defaultEffort: Extra High, HighDefault: High | Always enabledEffort: High, Medium, LowDefault: Medium |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | GPT |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Proprietary |
Pricing
GLM 5.2 is roughly 0.5x less expensive compared to GPT-5.1-Codex for input tokens and roughly 0.2x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.67 per million tokens | $1.25 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.10 per million tokens | $10.00 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | Not specified | $0.01 per search |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.12 per million tokens | $0.13 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.1-Codex.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 51.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 68.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 43.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,367 Elo (#3 in 3D (59.9% win rate)) | 1,203 Elo (#47 in Data Viz (50.7% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 5.2 and GPT-5.1-Codex unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 5.2 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare GPT-5.1-Codex with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks