GLM 5.2 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GLM 5.2 vs. Mistral Large 3 2512
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Mistral Large 3 2512 was released 6 months before GLM 5.2.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | Not specified tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | June 16, 2026 1 month ago June 16th, 2026 | December 1, 2025 7 months ago December 1st, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 5.2 | Mistral Large 3 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🖼️Image📁File |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Enabled by defaultEffort: Extra High, HighDefault: High | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Mistral |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Proprietary |
Pricing
GLM 5.2 is roughly 1.3x more expensive compared to Mistral Large 3 2512 for input tokens and roughly 1.4x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.67 per million tokens | $0.50 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.10 per million tokens | $1.50 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.12 per million tokens | $0.05 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 5.2 and Mistral Large 3 2512.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 51.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 15.9 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 68.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 20.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 43.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 5.5 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,367 Elo (#3 in 3D (59.9% win rate)) | 1,187 Elo (#61 in Website (49.4% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 5.2 and Mistral Large 3 2512 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 5.2 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Mistral Large 3 2512 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks