GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GPT-4.1 vs. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
GPT-4.1 was released 3 months before Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 32.8K tokens | 32K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 14, 2025 1 year ago April 14th, 2025 | July 29, 2025 12 months ago July 29th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | June 30, 2024 | June 30, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GPT-4.1 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text📁File | 📝Text |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | GPT | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning Mode✓Content Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Proprietary | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
GPT-4.1 is roughly 40.0x more expensive compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for input tokens and roughly 42.1x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $2.00 per million tokens | $0.05 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $8.00 per million tokens | $0.19 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | $0.01 per search | Not specified |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.50 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507.
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,136 Elo (#72 in Game Dev (59.1% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GPT-4.1 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks