Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Nemo (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Llama 4 Scout vs. Mistral Nemo
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Mistral Nemo was released 8 months before Llama 4 Scout.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1.3M tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 16.4K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 5, 2025 1 year ago April 5th, 2025 | July 19, 2024 2 years ago July 19th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | August 31, 2024 | April 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Llama 4 Scout | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🖼️Image | 📝Text |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Llama4 | Mistral |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Llama 4 Scout is roughly 5.0x more expensive compared to Mistral Nemo for input tokens and roughly 10.0x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.10 per million tokens | $0.02 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.30 per million tokens | $0.03 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Nemo.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 10 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 8.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 1.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 926 Elo (#106 in Data Viz (39.3% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Nemo unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Llama 4 Scout with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Mistral Nemo with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks