Magica logo

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Phi 4 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Claude Sonnet 5 vs. Phi 4
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Phi 4 was released 1 year before Claude Sonnet 5.
Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5
Phi 4Phi 4
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Microsoft logoMicrosoft
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1M
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
128K
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
June 30th, 2026
January 10th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
June 30, 2024

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Claude Sonnet 5
Phi 4
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🖼️Image📁File
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Enabled by defaultEffort: Max, Extra High, High, Medium, LowDefault: High
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
ClaudeOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
ProprietaryAvailable on HuggingFace →

Pricing

Claude Sonnet 5 is roughly 28.6x more expensive compared to Phi 4 for input tokens and roughly 71.4x more expensive for output tokens.
Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5
Phi 4Phi 4
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$2.00
per million tokens
$0.07
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$10.00
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
$0.01
per search
Not specified
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.20
per million tokens
Not specified
Cache Write Cost
Cost to write input tokens to the cache
$2.50
per million tokens
Not specified
1-Hour Cache Write Cost
Cost to cache input tokens for one hour
$4.00
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude Sonnet 5 and Phi 4.
Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5
Phi 4Phi 4
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
53.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
71.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
46.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,345 Elo
(#3 in Game Dev (59.9% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Claude Sonnet 5 and Phi 4 unique.
Anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5 by Anthropic understands both text and images, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Reasonably priced at $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output tokens. Includes built-in content moderation for safer outputs. Released June 30th, 2026.
Microsoft logoPhi 4 by Microsoft generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 16.4K token context window. Very affordable at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output tokens. Released January 10th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare Phi 4 with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🔬Science

Scientific research and analysis