Magica logo

MiMo-V2.5 vs Phi 4 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: MiMo-V2.5 vs. Phi 4
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Phi 4 was released 1 year before MiMo-V2.5.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Phi 4Phi 4
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Microsoft logoMicrosoft
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1.1M
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
131.1K
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 22nd, 2026
January 10th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
June 30, 2024

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
MiMo-V2.5
Phi 4
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
OtherOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 2.0x more expensive compared to Phi 4 for input tokens and roughly 2.0x more expensive for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Phi 4Phi 4
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.07
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.0028
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between MiMo-V2.5 and Phi 4.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Phi 4Phi 4
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,301 Elo
(#16 in Game Dev (56.5% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes MiMo-V2.5 and Phi 4 unique.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.
Microsoft logoPhi 4 by Microsoft generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 16.4K token context window. Very affordable at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output tokens. Released January 10th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:

Compare Phi 4 with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🔬Science

Scientific research and analysis