Magica logo

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.1 vs. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was released 1 month before DeepSeek V3.1.
DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Google logoGoogle
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
163.8K
tokens
1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
32.8K
tokens
65.5K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
August 21st, 2025
July 22nd, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
March 31, 2025
January 31, 2025

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text🖼️Image📁File🎵Audio🎬Video
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekGemini
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Proprietary

Pricing

DeepSeek V3.1 is roughly 2.5x more expensive compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite for input tokens and roughly 2.4x more expensive for output tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.25
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.95
per million tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
Not specified
$0.014
per search
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.13
per million tokens
$0.01
per million tokens
Cache Write Cost
Cost to write input tokens to the cache
Not specified
$0.08
per million tokens
Reasoning Token Cost
Cost for internal reasoning tokens
Not specified
$0.40
per million tokens
Image Input Cost
Additional cost for each image input
Not specified
$0.0000001
per image
Audio Input Cost
Additional cost for audio input
Not specified
$0.0000003
per unit
Audio Cache Cost
Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens
Not specified
$0.03
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.
DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,149 Elo
(#72 in Website (48.0% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite unique.
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 163.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.25/M input and $0.95/M output tokens. Released August 21st, 2025.
Google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite by Google understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Released July 22nd, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories