DeepSeek V3 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3 vs. Gemma 4 26B A4B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
DeepSeek V3 was released 1 year before Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 16K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | December 26, 2024 1 year ago December 26th, 2024 | April 3, 2026 3 months ago April 3rd, 2026 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | July 31, 2024 | Not reported |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3 | Gemma 4 26B A4B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Not reported | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Gemma |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
DeepSeek V3 is roughly 1.7x more expensive compared to Gemma 4 26B A4B for input tokens and roughly 2.3x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.20 per million tokens | $0.12 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.80 per million tokens | $0.35 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.05 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3 and Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 25.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 39.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 11 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,145 Elo (#64 in 3D (50.7% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3 and Gemma 4 26B A4B unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare DeepSeek V3 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks