R1 0528 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: R1 0528 vs. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
R1 0528 was released 3 months before Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 32.8K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | May 28, 2025 1 year ago May 28th, 2025 | September 23, 2025 10 months ago September 23rd, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
R1 0528 | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🖼️Image |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Always enabled | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
R1 0528 is roughly 1.9x more expensive compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking for input tokens and roughly 0.8x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.50 per million tokens | $0.26 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.15 per million tokens | $2.60 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.35 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,214 Elo (#42 in Data Viz (60.7% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes R1 0528 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare R1 0528 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks