Magica logo

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs GLM 5.2 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs. GLM 5.2
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus was released 8 months before GLM 5.2.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
GLM 5.2GLM 5.2
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Z.AI logoZ.AI
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
163.8K
tokens
1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
32.8K
tokens
1M
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
September 22nd, 2025
June 16th, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
March 31, 2025
Not reported

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
GLM 5.2
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Enabled by defaultEffort: Extra High, HighDefault: High
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is roughly 0.6x less expensive compared to GLM 5.2 for input tokens and roughly 0.7x less expensive for output tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
GLM 5.2GLM 5.2
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
$0.42
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.95
per million tokens
$1.40
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.13
per million tokens
$0.07
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GLM 5.2.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
GLM 5.2GLM 5.2
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
Benchmark not available.
52.6
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
43.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
68.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
Benchmark not available.
45.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,216 Elo
(#43 in UI Component (59.5% win rate))
1,363 Elo
(#4 in 3D (59.9% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and GLM 5.2 unique.
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 163.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.27/M input and $0.95/M output tokens. Released September 22nd, 2025.
Z.AI logoGLM 5.2 by Z.AI can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.42/M input and $1.40/M output tokens. Released June 16th, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare GLM 5.2 with: