Magica logo

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs. MiMo-V2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus was released 7 months before MiMo-V2.5.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
163.8K
tokens
1.1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
32.8K
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
September 22nd, 2025
April 22nd, 2026
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
March 31, 2025
Not reported

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
MiMo-V2.5
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is roughly 1.9x more expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 3.6x more expensive for output tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.0028
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiMo-V2.5.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
30.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
43.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
18.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,220 Elo
(#41 in UI Component (59.3% win rate))
1,291 Elo
(#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 163.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.27/M input and $1.00/M output tokens. Released September 22nd, 2025.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with: