Magica logo

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was released 1 day before Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Google logoGoogle
Qwen logoQwen
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1M
tokens
262.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
65.5K
tokens
65.5K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
July 22nd, 2025
July 23rd, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
January 31, 2025
June 30, 2025

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🖼️Image📁File🎵Audio🎬Video
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GeminiQwen3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
ProprietaryAvailable on HuggingFace →

Pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite is roughly 0.3x less expensive compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for input tokens and roughly 0.4x less expensive for output tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
$0.30
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
$0.014
per search
Not specified
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.01
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Cache Write Cost
Cost to write input tokens to the cache
$0.08
per million tokens
Not specified
Reasoning Token Cost
Cost for internal reasoning tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
Not specified
Image Input Cost
Additional cost for each image input
$0.0000001
per image
Not specified
Audio Input Cost
Additional cost for audio input
$0.0000003
per unit
Not specified
Audio Cache Cost
Cost to reuse cached audio input tokens
$0.03
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
Benchmark not available.
1,184 Elo
(#63 in Website (61.7% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B unique.
Google logoGemini 2.5 Flash Lite by Google understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Released July 22nd, 2025.
Qwen logoQwen3 Coder 480B A35B by Qwen can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output tokens. Released July 23rd, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories