Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4.1 Nano (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 2 27B vs. GPT-4.1 Nano
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Gemma 2 27B was released 9 months before GPT-4.1 Nano.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 8.2K tokens | 1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 2K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | July 13, 2024 2 years ago July 13th, 2024 | April 14, 2025 1 year ago April 14th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | June 30, 2024 | June 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 2 27B | GPT-4.1 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 🖼️Image📝Text📁File |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemini | GPT |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning Mode✓Content Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Proprietary |
Pricing
Gemma 2 27B is roughly 6.5x more expensive compared to GPT-4.1 Nano for input tokens and roughly 1.6x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.65 per million tokens | $0.10 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.65 per million tokens | $0.40 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | Not specified | $0.01 per search |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.02 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4.1 Nano.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 9.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 11.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 1.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,027 Elo (#96 in Game Dev (49.6% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 2 27B and GPT-4.1 Nano unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 2 27B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare GPT-4.1 Nano with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks