Magica logo

Gemma 3 27B vs Sonar (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 3 27B vs. Sonar
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Sonar was released 1 month before Gemma 3 27B.
Gemma 3 27BGemma 3 27B
SonarSonar
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Google logoGoogle
Perplexity logoPerplexity
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
262.1K
tokens
127.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
131.1K
tokens
Not specified
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
March 12th, 2025
January 27th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
August 31, 2024
Not reported

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 3 27B
Sonar
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🖼️Image
📝Text🖼️Image
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GeminiOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Proprietary

Pricing

Gemma 3 27B is roughly 0.08x less expensive compared to Sonar for input tokens and roughly 0.5x less expensive for output tokens.
Gemma 3 27BGemma 3 27B
SonarSonar
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.08
per million tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.45
per million tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
Not specified
$0.005
per search
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.04
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 3 27B and Sonar.
Gemma 3 27BGemma 3 27B
SonarSonar
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
7.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
10.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
0.3
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Gemma 3 27B and Sonar unique.
Google logoGemma 3 27B by Google understands both text and images, can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.08/M input and $0.45/M output tokens. Released March 12th, 2025.
Perplexity logoSonar by Perplexity understands both text and images. It can handle standard conversations with its 127.1K token context window. Reasonably priced at $1.00/M input and $1.00/M output tokens. Released January 27th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare Sonar with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🔬Science

Scientific research and analysis