Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 3 4B vs. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Gemma 3 4B was released 4 months before Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 131.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 16.4K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | March 13, 2025 1 year ago March 13th, 2025 | July 25, 2025 1 year ago July 25th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | August 31, 2024 | June 30, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🖼️Image | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Not reported | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemini | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 3 4B is roughly 0.2x less expensive compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for input tokens and roughly 0.03x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.10 per million tokens | $3.00 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 19.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 2.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 22.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 3.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,077 Elo (#92 in Website (42.1% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 3 4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks