Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 4 Scout (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs. Llama 4 Scout
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Llama 4 Scout was released 12 months before Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 1.3M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 3, 2026 3 months ago April 3rd, 2026 | April 5, 2025 1 year ago April 5th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | August 31, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 26B A4B | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text🖼️Image |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Llama4 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 26B A4B is roughly 1.2x more expensive compared to Llama 4 Scout for input tokens and roughly 1.2x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.12 per million tokens | $0.10 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.35 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama 4 Scout.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 25.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 10 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 39.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 8.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 11 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 1.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 929 Elo (#105 in Data Viz (39.3% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Llama 4 Scout unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Llama 4 Scout with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks