Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M2 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs. MiniMax M2
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
MiniMax M2 was released 5 months before Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 3, 2026 3 months ago April 3rd, 2026 | October 23, 2025 9 months ago October 23rd, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 26B A4B | MiniMax M2 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 26B A4B is roughly 0.5x less expensive compared to MiniMax M2 for input tokens and roughly 0.3x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.12 per million tokens | $0.26 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.35 per million tokens | $1.02 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiniMax M2.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 25.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 39.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 11 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,175 Elo (#60 in Game Dev (48.1% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiniMax M2 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare MiniMax M2 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks