Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K2 Thinking (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. Kimi K2 Thinking
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Kimi K2 Thinking was released 4 months before Gemma 4 31B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 100.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 2, 2026 3 months ago April 2nd, 2026 | November 6, 2025 8 months ago November 6th, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B | Kimi K2 Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 31B is roughly 0.2x less expensive compared to Kimi K2 Thinking for input tokens and roughly 0.2x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.60 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $2.50 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.15 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and Kimi K2 Thinking.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 29.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 17.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 43.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 21 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 1.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,138 Elo (#79 in Website (48.8% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and Kimi K2 Thinking unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 31B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks