Magica logo

Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. MiMo-V2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Gemma 4 31B was released 20 days before MiMo-V2.5.
Gemma 4 31BGemma 4 31B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Google logoGoogle
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
262.1K
tokens
1.1M
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
262.1K
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 2nd, 2026
April 22nd, 2026

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B
MiMo-V2.5
Input Types
Supported input formats
🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GemmaOther
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

Gemma 4 31B is roughly 1.0x less expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 1.4x more expensive for output tokens.
Gemma 4 31BGemma 4 31B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
Not specified
$0.0028
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5.
Gemma 4 31BGemma 4 31B
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
29.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
43.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
14.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
Benchmark not available.
1,291 Elo
(#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
Google logoGemma 4 31B by Google understands both text and images, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Released April 2nd, 2026.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with: