Gemma 4 31B vs MiniMax M3 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. MiniMax M3
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Gemma 4 31B was released 1 month before MiniMax M3.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 512K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 2, 2026 3 months ago April 2nd, 2026 | May 31, 2026 1 month ago May 31st, 2026 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B | MiniMax M3 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text🖼️Image🎬Video |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 31B is roughly 0.5x less expensive compared to MiniMax M3 for input tokens and roughly 0.3x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $1.20 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | Not specified | $0.06 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and MiniMax M3.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 29.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 44.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 43.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 58.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 35.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,285 Elo (#19 in Code Categories (54.6% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and MiniMax M3 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 31B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare MiniMax M3 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks