Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released 1 year before Gemma 4 31B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 2, 2026 3 months ago April 2nd, 2026 | September 19, 2024 1 year ago September 19th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | June 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Qwen |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 31B is roughly 0.4x less expensive compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 1.0x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.36 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $0.40 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 29.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 43.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 31B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks