Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 14B (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. Qwen3 14B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen3 14B was released 11 months before Gemma 4 31B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 8.2K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 2, 2026 3 months ago April 2nd, 2026 | April 28, 2025 1 year ago April 28th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | March 31, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 31B is roughly 0.6x less expensive compared to Qwen3 14B for input tokens and roughly 0.4x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.23 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $0.91 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 14B.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 29.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 10.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 43.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 13.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 1.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 14B unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 31B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 14B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks