Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 31B vs. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 was released 8 months before Gemma 4 31B.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 2, 2026 3 months ago April 2nd, 2026 | July 21, 2025 1 year ago July 21st, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | June 30, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 31B is roughly 1.6x more expensive compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for input tokens and roughly 0.7x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.09 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $0.55 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 29.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 43.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,091 Elo (#85 in Data Viz (47.7% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 31B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks