GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GLM 4.5 Air vs. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 was released 0 day before GLM 4.5 Air.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 131.1K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 98.3K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | July 25, 2025 1 year ago July 25th, 2025 | July 25, 2025 1 year ago July 25th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | December 31, 2024 | June 30, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 4.5 Air | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function CallingStructured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
GLM 4.5 Air is roughly 0.4x less expensive compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for input tokens and roughly 0.3x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.13 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.85 per million tokens | $3.00 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.02 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 19.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 22.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 3.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,225 Elo (#41 in Data Viz (59.4% win rate)) | 1,078 Elo (#92 in Website (42.1% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 4.5 Air with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks