GLM 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
GLM 4.5 was released 9 months before MiMo-V2.5.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 131.1K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 98.3K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | July 25, 2025 1 year ago July 25th, 2025 | April 22, 2026 3 months ago April 22nd, 2026 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | December 31, 2024 | Not reported |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 4.5 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
GLM 4.5 is roughly 4.3x more expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 7.9x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.60 per million tokens | $0.14 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.20 per million tokens | $0.28 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.11 per million tokens | $0.0028 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 4.5 and MiMo-V2.5.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 37.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | Benchmark not available. | 56.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | Benchmark not available. | 23.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,229 Elo (#38 in 3D (59.7% win rate)) | 1,291 Elo (#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 4.5 and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 4.5 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks