GLM 4.6 vs gpt-oss-120b (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GLM 4.6 vs. gpt-oss-120b
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
gpt-oss-120b was released 1 month before GLM 4.6.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 204.8K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | September 30, 2025 10 months ago September 30th, 2025 | August 5, 2025 11 months ago August 5th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | March 31, 2025 | June 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GLM 4.6 | gpt-oss-120b | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Always enabledEffort: High, Medium, LowDefault: Medium |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | GPT |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
GLM 4.6 is roughly 12.5x more expensive compared to gpt-oss-120b for input tokens and roughly 11.8x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.50 per million tokens | $0.04 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $2.00 per million tokens | $0.17 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.10 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GLM 4.6 and gpt-oss-120b.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 28.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 23.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 45.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 30.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 17.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 13.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,207 Elo (#44 in Game Dev (54.6% win rate)) | 1,050 Elo (#91 in Game Dev (40.6% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GLM 4.6 and gpt-oss-120b unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GLM 4.6 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare gpt-oss-120b with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks