Magica logo

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GPT-4.1 Nano vs. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 was released 7 months before GPT-4.1 Nano.
GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
OpenAI logoOpenAI
Sao10K logoSao10K
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1M
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
32.8K
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 14th, 2025
August 28th, 2024
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
June 30, 2024
December 31, 2023

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GPT-4.1 Nano
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input Types
Supported input formats
🖼️Image📝Text📁File
📝Text
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
GPTLlama3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
ProprietaryAvailable on HuggingFace →

Pricing

GPT-4.1 Nano is roughly 0.1x less expensive compared to Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 for input tokens and roughly 0.5x less expensive for output tokens.
GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
$0.85
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
$0.85
per million tokens
Web Search Cost
Additional cost for each web search operation
$0.01
per search
Not specified
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.02
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2.
GPT-4.1 NanoGPT-4.1 Nano
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
9.6
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
11.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
1.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,027 Elo
(#97 in Game Dev (49.6% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 unique.
OpenAI logoGPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI understands both text and images, can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Includes built-in content moderation for safer outputs. Released April 14th, 2025.
Sao10K logoLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 by Sao10K can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 131.1K token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.85/M input and $0.85/M output tokens. Released August 28th, 2024.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories