gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: gpt-oss-120b vs. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
gpt-oss-120b was released 23 days before Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 131.1K tokens | 81.9K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | August 5, 2025 11 months ago August 5th, 2025 | August 28, 2025 11 months ago August 28th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | June 30, 2024 | June 30, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Always enabledEffort: High, Medium, LowDefault: Medium | Always enabled |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | GPT | Qwen3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
gpt-oss-120b is roughly 0.3x less expensive compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for input tokens and roughly 0.1x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.04 per million tokens | $0.13 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.17 per million tokens | $1.56 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between gpt-oss-120b and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 23.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 14.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 30.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 12.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 13.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 1.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,050 Elo (#91 in Game Dev (40.6% win rate)) | 958 Elo (#102 in Data Viz (33.3% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes gpt-oss-120b and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare gpt-oss-120b with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks