Kimi K3 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Kimi K3 vs. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released 1 year before Kimi K3.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | Not specified tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | July 16, 2026 11 days ago July 16th, 2026 | September 19, 2024 1 year ago September 19th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | June 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Kimi K3 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🖼️Image | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Enabled by defaultEffort: Max, High, LowDefault: Max | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Qwen |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Proprietary | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Kimi K3 is roughly 8.3x more expensive compared to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 37.5x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $3.00 per million tokens | $0.36 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $15.00 per million tokens | $0.40 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.30 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Kimi K3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 57.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 76.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 50.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,456 Elo (#1 in 3D (69.2% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Kimi K3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Kimi K3 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen2.5 72B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks