Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5 (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs. MiMo-V2.5
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct was released 1 year before MiMo-V2.5.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 131.1K tokens | 1.1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | July 23, 2024 2 years ago July 23rd, 2024 | April 22, 2026 3 months ago April 22nd, 2026 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | December 31, 2023 | Not reported |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Not reported | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Llama3 | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is roughly 0.4x less expensive compared to MiMo-V2.5 for input tokens and roughly 0.3x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | $0.14 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.08 per million tokens | $0.28 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.02 per million tokens | $0.0028 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 7.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 37.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 5.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 56.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 0.5 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 23.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | Benchmark not available. | 1,301 Elo (#16 in Game Dev (56.5% win rate)) |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5 unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks