Magica logo

MiMo-V2.5 vs Saba (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: MiMo-V2.5 vs. Saba
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Saba was released 1 year before MiMo-V2.5.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
SabaSaba
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Mistral logoMistral
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1.1M
tokens
32.8K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
131.1K
tokens
Not specified
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 22nd, 2026
February 17th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
September 30, 2024

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
MiMo-V2.5
Saba
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
📝Text📁File
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
OtherMistral
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Proprietary

Pricing

MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 0.7x less expensive compared to Saba for input tokens and roughly 0.5x less expensive for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
SabaSaba
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.20
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
$0.60
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.0028
per million tokens
$0.02
per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between MiMo-V2.5 and Saba.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
SabaSaba
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,301 Elo
(#16 in Game Dev (56.5% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes MiMo-V2.5 and Saba unique.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.
Mistral logoSaba by Mistral can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 32.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.20/M input and $0.60/M output tokens. Released February 17th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:

Compare Saba with:

🚀Programming

Best models for coding and development

🎨Creative & Roleplay

Models optimized for creative writing

📢Marketing

Content creation and marketing tasks

💻Technology

Technical analysis and explanations

🔬Science

Scientific research and analysis