MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: MiMo-V2.5 vs. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct was released 1 year before MiMo-V2.5.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1.1M tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 131.1K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 22, 2026 3 months ago April 22nd, 2026 | November 11, 2024 1 year ago November 11th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | June 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Other | Qwen |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 0.2x less expensive compared to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 0.3x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.14 per million tokens | $0.66 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.28 per million tokens | $1.00 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.0028 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 37.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 56.8 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 23.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,291 Elo (#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks