Magica logo

MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 32B (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: MiMo-V2.5 vs. Qwen3 32B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Qwen3 32B was released 11 months before MiMo-V2.5.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 32BQwen3 32B
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Qwen logoQwen
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1.1M
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
131.1K
tokens
16.4K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 22nd, 2026
April 28th, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
March 31, 2025

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 32B
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Optional
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
OtherQwen3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 1.8x more expensive compared to Qwen3 32B for input tokens and roughly 1.0x less expensive for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 32BQwen3 32B
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.08
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.0028
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 32B.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 32BQwen3 32B
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
11.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
15.3
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
1.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,291 Elo
(#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 32B unique.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.
Qwen logoQwen3 32B by Qwen can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 131.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.08/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 28th, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with:

Compare Qwen3 32B with: