DeepSeek V3.2 vs Hermes 3 70B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.2 vs. Hermes 3 70B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Hermes 3 70B Instruct was released 1 year before DeepSeek V3.2.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 65.5K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | December 1, 2025 7 months ago December 1st, 2025 | August 18, 2024 1 year ago August 18th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | December 31, 2023 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.2 | Hermes 3 70B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Llama3 |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
DeepSeek V3.2 is roughly 0.4x less expensive compared to Hermes 3 70B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 0.6x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.27 per million tokens | $0.70 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $0.70 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.13 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.2 and Hermes 3 70B Instruct.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 32 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 44.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 18.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,200 Elo (#55 in Website (50.2% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.2 and Hermes 3 70B Instruct unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare DeepSeek V3.2 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Hermes 3 70B Instruct with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks