DeepSeek V3.2 vs Nova 2 Lite (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.2 vs. Nova 2 Lite
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
DeepSeek V3.2 was released 1 day before Nova 2 Lite.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 163.8K tokens | 1M tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 65.5K tokens | 65.5K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | December 1, 2025 7 months ago December 1st, 2025 | December 2, 2025 7 months ago December 2nd, 2025 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.2 | Nova 2 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text🖼️Image🎬Video📁File |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Optional |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Nova |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | ✓Function CallingStructured Output✓Reasoning Mode✓Content Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Proprietary |
Pricing
DeepSeek V3.2 is roughly 0.9x less expensive compared to Nova 2 Lite for input tokens and roughly 0.2x less expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.27 per million tokens | $0.30 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $2.50 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.13 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.2 and Nova 2 Lite.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 32 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 18.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 44.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 23 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 18.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 3.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,200 Elo (#55 in Website (50.1% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.2 and Nova 2 Lite unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare DeepSeek V3.2 with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Nova 2 Lite with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks