DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemma 3n 4B (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Gemma 3n 4B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Gemma 3n 4B was released 11 months before DeepSeek V4 Pro.
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | ||
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 384K tokens | Not specified tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 24, 2026 3 months ago April 24th, 2026 | May 20, 2025 1 year ago May 20th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | August 31, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro | Gemma 3n 4B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | OptionalEffort: Extra High, HighDefault: High | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | DeepSeek | Other |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
DeepSeek V4 Pro is roughly 7.2x more expensive compared to Gemma 3n 4B for input tokens and roughly 7.3x more expensive for output tokens.
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.43 per million tokens | $0.06 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.87 per million tokens | $0.12 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.0036 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 3n 4B.
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 44.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 59.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | 3.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 36.4 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,310 Elo (#11 in 3D (58.8% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemma 3n 4B unique.
Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare DeepSeek V4 Pro with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Gemma 3n 4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks