GPT-4.1 Nano vs Saba (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: GPT-4.1 Nano vs. Saba
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
Saba was released 1 month before GPT-4.1 Nano.
 GPT-4.1 Nano |  Saba | |
|---|---|---|
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | OpenAI | Mistral |
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 1M tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 32.8K tokens | Not specified tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 14, 2025 1 year ago April 14th, 2025 | February 17, 2025 1 year ago February 17th, 2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | June 30, 2024 | September 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
GPT-4.1 Nano | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text📁File | 📝Text📁File |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | GPT | Mistral |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning Mode✓Content Moderation | ✓Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Pricing
GPT-4.1 Nano is roughly 0.5x less expensive compared to Saba for input tokens and roughly 0.7x less expensive for output tokens.
| GPT-4.1 Nano | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.10 per million tokens | $0.20 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.40 per million tokens | $0.60 per million tokens |
Web Search Cost Additional cost for each web search operation | $0.01 per search | Not specified |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.02 per million tokens | $0.02 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4.1 Nano and Saba.
| GPT-4.1 Nano | Saba | |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 9.6 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 11.1 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 1.2 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Best Design Arena Score Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas | 1,027 Elo (#97 in Game Dev (49.6% win rate)) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes GPT-4.1 Nano and Saba unique.
GPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI understands both text and images, can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output tokens. Includes built-in content moderation for safer outputs. Released April 14th, 2025.Saba by Mistral can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 32.8K token context window. Very affordable at $0.20/M input and $0.60/M output tokens. Released February 17th, 2025.Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare GPT-4.1 Nano with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare Saba with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks