Magica logo

MiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: MiMo-V2.5 vs. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct was released 8 months before MiMo-V2.5.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
Xiaomi logoXiaomi
Qwen logoQwen
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
1.1M
tokens
262.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
131.1K
tokens
32.8K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
April 22nd, 2026
July 31st, 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
Not reported
June 30, 2025

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text🎵Audio🖼️Image🎬Video
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
OtherQwen3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 2.0x more expensive compared to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 1.0x more expensive for output tokens.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
$0.07
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$0.28
per million tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.0028
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.
MiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
37.2
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
56.8
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
23.7
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,291 Elo
(#19 in Game Dev (55.3% win rate))
1,117 Elo
(#82 in Data Viz (54.7% win rate))

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct unique.
Xiaomi logoMiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi understands both text and images, handles audio, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 1.1M token context window. Very affordable at $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output tokens. Released April 22nd, 2026.
Qwen logoQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct by Qwen can use external tools and APIs, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.07/M input and $0.27/M output tokens. Released July 31st, 2025.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories

Compare MiMo-V2.5 with: