Magica logo

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct (Comparative Analysis)

Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free

Overview

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct was released 12 months before DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Llama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Model Provider
The organization behind this AI's development
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek
Meta logoMeta
Input Context Window
Maximum input tokens this model can process at once
131.1K
tokens
131.1K
tokens
Output Token Limit
Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once
32.8K
tokens
60K
tokens
Release Date
When this model first became publicly available
September 22nd, 2025
September 25th, 2024
Knowledge Cutoff
Latest training-data date reported by the provider
March 31, 2025
December 31, 2023

Capabilities & Features

Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input Types
Supported input formats
📝Text
📝Text
Reasoning Controls
Defaults and configurable reasoning effort
Optional
Not reported
Output Types
Supported output formats
📝Text
📝Text
Tokenizer
Text encoding system
DeepSeekLlama3
Key Features
Advanced capabilities
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Function CallingStructured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation
Open Source
Model availability
Available on HuggingFace →Available on HuggingFace →

Pricing

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is roughly 9.0x more expensive compared to Llama 3.2 1B Instruct for input tokens and roughly 5.0x more expensive for output tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Llama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input Token Cost
Cost per million input tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
$0.03
per million tokens
Output Token Cost
Cost per million output tokens
$1.00
per million tokens
$0.20
per million tokens
Cache Read Cost
Cost to reuse cached input tokens
$0.14
per million tokens
Not specified

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct.
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Llama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Intelligence Index
Overall model quality across independent evaluations
30.4
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Coding Index
Programming performance across independent evaluations
43.5
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Agentic Index
Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks
18.1
(Artificial Analysis index; higher is better)
Benchmark not available.
Best Design Arena Score
Highest human-preference Elo score across design arenas
1,223 Elo
(#39 in UI Component (59.3% win rate))
Benchmark not available.

At a Glance

Quick overview of what makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct unique.
DeepSeek logoDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus by DeepSeek can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 131.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.27/M input and $1.00/M output tokens. Released September 22nd, 2025.
Meta logoLlama 3.2 1B Instruct by Meta is a text-based AI model. It can handle standard conversations with its 131.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.03/M input and $0.20/M output tokens. Released September 25th, 2024.

Explore More Comparisons

Compare your models with top performers across different categories