Gemma 4 26B A4B vs WizardLM-2 8x22B (Comparative Analysis)
Loading comparison form...
Comparative Analysis: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs. WizardLM-2 8x22B
Want to try out these models side by side?Try Magica for free
Overview
WizardLM-2 8x22B was released 1 year before Gemma 4 26B A4B.
 Gemma 4 26B A4B |  WizardLM-2 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
Model Provider The organization behind this AI's development | Google | Microsoft |
Input Context Window Maximum input tokens this model can process at once | 262.1K tokens | 65.5K tokens |
Output Token Limit Maximum output tokens this model can generate at once | 262.1K tokens | 8K tokens |
Release Date When this model first became publicly available | April 3, 2026 3 months ago April 3rd, 2026 | April 16, 2024 2 years ago April 16th, 2024 |
Knowledge Cutoff Latest training-data date reported by the provider | Not reported | April 30, 2024 |
Capabilities & Features
Compare supported features, modalities, and advanced capabilities
Gemma 4 26B A4B | WizardLM-2 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Types Supported input formats | 🖼️Image📝Text🎬Video | 📝Text |
Reasoning Controls Defaults and configurable reasoning effort | Optional | Not reported |
Output Types Supported output formats | 📝Text | 📝Text |
Tokenizer Text encoding system | Gemma | Mistral |
Key Features Advanced capabilities | ✓Function Calling✓Structured Output✓Reasoning ModeContent Moderation | Function Calling✓Structured OutputReasoning ModeContent Moderation |
Open Source Model availability | Available on HuggingFace → | Available on HuggingFace → |
Pricing
Gemma 4 26B A4B is roughly 0.2x less expensive compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B for input tokens and roughly 0.6x less expensive for output tokens.
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | WizardLM-2 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
Input Token Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.12 per million tokens | $0.62 per million tokens |
Output Token Cost Cost per million output tokens | $0.35 per million tokens | $0.62 per million tokens |
Cache Read Cost Cost to reuse cached input tokens | $0.05 per million tokens | Not specified |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 4 26B A4B and WizardLM-2 8x22B.
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | WizardLM-2 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall model quality across independent evaluations | 25.7 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Coding Index Programming performance across independent evaluations | 39.3 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
Agentic Index Ability to complete multi-step agentic tasks | 11 (Artificial Analysis index; higher is better) | Benchmark not available. |
At a Glance
Quick overview of what makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and WizardLM-2 8x22B unique.
Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google understands both text and images, analyzes video, can use external tools and APIs, offers advanced reasoning, generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 262.1K token context window. Very affordable at $0.12/M input and $0.35/M output tokens. Released April 3rd, 2026.WizardLM-2 8x22B by Microsoft generates structured data. It can handle standard conversations with its 65.5K token context window. Reasonably priced at $0.62/M input and $0.62/M output tokens. Released April 16th, 2024.Explore More Comparisons
Compare your models with top performers across different categories
Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks
Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:
🚀Programming
Best models for coding and development
🎨Creative & Roleplay
Models optimized for creative writing
📢Marketing
Content creation and marketing tasks
💻Technology
Technical analysis and explanations
🔬Science
Scientific research and analysis
🌐Translation
Multilingual translation tasks